According to a statement by the Group Chief Branding and Communications Officer of Dangote Industries Limited, Anthony Chiejina, this claim is a misrepresentation of the facts.
The $1 billion investment, Chiejina explained, was actually part of a partnership deal between Dangote Refinery and NNPCL, where the latter acquired a 20% stake in the refinery for $2.76 billion.
The payment terms were structured such that NNPCL would pay $1 billion upfront, with the balance recovered over five years through crude oil supplies and dividends.
Chiejina argued that if the refinery was indeed facing liquidity challenges, it would not have offered such generous payment terms to NNPCL.
He also noted that the refinery was still in its pre-commission stage in 2021 when the agreement was signed, and that the deal was not cash-based but rather credit-driven.
The partnership, however, took a hit when NNPCL failed to supply the agreed 300,000 barrels of crude oil per day, citing commitments to financiers.
The statement reads “We have received numerous inquiries from the media and other concerned stakeholders seeking clarification on a recent report attributed to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) that their decision to secure a $1 billion loan backed by its crude was instrumental in supporting the Dangote refinery during liquidity challenges.
“We would like to clarify that this is a misrepresentation of the situation as $1bn is just about 5% of the investment that went into building the Dangote Refinery.
“Our decision to enter into a partnership with NNPCL was based on recognition of their strategic position in the industry as the largest off taker of Nigerian crude and at the time, the sole supplier of gasoline into Nigeria.
“We agreed on the sale of a 20% stake at a value of $2.76 billion. Of this, we agreed that they will only pay $1 billion while the balance will be recovered over a period of 5 years through deductions on crude oil that they supply to us and from dividends due to them.
“If we were struggling with liquidity challenges we wouldn’t have given them such generous payment terms. As at 2021 when the agreement was signed, the refinery was at the pre-commission stage. In addition, if we were struggling with liquidity issue, this agreement would have been cash based rather than credit driven.
“Unfortunately, NNPCL was later unable to supply the agreed 300 thousand barrels a day of crude given that they had committed a greater part of their crude cargoes to financiers with the expectation of higher production which they were unable to achieve”, it added.
Dangote Refinery however, gave NNPCL a 12-month window to pay the outstanding balance in cash, which expired on June 30, 2024. Consequently, NNPCL’s equity share was revised downward to 7.24%.
“We subsequently gave them a 12-month period for them to pay cash for the balance of their equity given their inability to supply the agreed crude oil volume. NNPCL failed to meet this deadline which expired on June 30th 2024. As a result, their equity share was revised down to 7.24%. These events have been widely reported by both parties.
“It is, therefore, inaccurate to claim that NNPCL facilitated a $1 billion investment amid liquidity challenges. Like all business partners, NNPCL invested, $1 billion in the Refinery to acquire an ownership stake of 7.24% stake that is beneficial to its interests.
The statement added “NNPCL remains our valued partner in progress, and it is imperative for all stakeholders to adhere to the facts and present the narrative in the correct context, to guide the media in reporting accurately for the benefit of our stakeholders and the public.
